Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-09-10, 10:38
WendyPusey's Avatar
WendyPusey WendyPusey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 500
Question Time on Birth Certificate.

I have just recieved a birth certificate and it has a time of birth on it.

(1/2 past 5 a.m. - I assume this means 5.30 am)

Does this mean that he could have been a twin?

I can find no other birth registration for that time and no death either, and there is no other child living in the house on the 1841 census (although they were in the workhouse).
__________________
Wendy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-09-10, 10:45
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,319
Default

In the early days of civil registration, some registrars put the time of birth on all the birth certificates whether they were multiple births or not. It sounds like one of those cases.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-10, 10:51
WendyPusey's Avatar
WendyPusey WendyPusey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 500
Default

Thanks Kite.

Never had one with time before, so wasn't sure.
__________________
Wendy
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-10, 10:53
Rachel's Avatar
Rachel Rachel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 737
Default

The Scottish ones always show the time of birth.
It's really useful if you're at all interested in Astrology
__________________
Rachel
FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS, PLEASE SCAN AT 300-600 dpi AND AT LEAST 100% SCALE.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-10, 16:50
Langley Vale Sue's Avatar
Langley Vale Sue Langley Vale Sue is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Langley Vale!
Posts: 826
Default

My GGG grandfather's birth certificate from 1837 also has a time shown on it. I'm almost certain he wasn't a twin so I agree with Kite and think that it was a dilligent registrar.
__________________
"What you see depends on what you're looking for."

Sue at Langley Vale
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:47.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.