Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23-03-16, 22:54
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default Yorkshire Quarter Sessions

I think my Richard Simpson appears in these records. Can someone please have a look and help me?

Richard Simpson

Given Elkanah Jenkinson was given the warrent does that mean Elkanah had something to do with the crime or was he just a person who executed summons? (Elkanah is male, I thought he was the woman who had the child but this is not the case).

Elkanah married a woman called Rachel in 1804 and they had a child, John, in 1804. Given the warrant was issued in 1810 it isn't likely the child my Richard is supposed to have fathered was John is it?

The warrant lists others who helped Richard escape from custody. Can anyone find any details of a Christiana Simpson who I think is Richard's sister but I can't find anything now.

I don't know but suspect James Forrest is Richard's BIL and William Sugden's sister Rebecca marries Richard's brother in 1815.

Richard stays in the area and marries Susannah Wilkinson later in 1810 but I can find no record of any other court proceedings. Would it have just been dropped?
__________________
Toni

Last edited by Kit; 23-03-16 at 23:04.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-03-16, 00:15
JBee JBee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 1,864
Default

Yes it looks like Elkanah Jenkinson arrested Richard Simpson but James Forrest an innkeeper and his wife Ann, his sister Christiana Simpson a single woman, together with Richard Fenton, William Roe and William Sugden all labourers intervened and forcibly released him.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-03-16, 08:01
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,319
Default

At the top of the next page it says "Wakefield Sessions January 1811 Quashed".
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-03-16, 08:27
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

Thanks Kite. That means got rid of, doesn't it?
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-03-16, 08:52
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,319
Default

It means the conviction was overturned (I think).
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-03-16, 11:46
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

Quote:
reject as invalid, especially by legal procedure.
"his conviction was quashed on appeal"
This is what google said. Should have gone there first but i trust people here more.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.