Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25-09-14, 15:41
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,345
Default This is confusing.....

www.parliament.uk says:

In 1929, in response to a campaign by the National Union of Societies for Equal Citizenship, Parliament raised the age limit to 16 for both sexes in the Ages of Marriage Act. This is still the minimum age.

and Ancestry says:

1763 — Minimum age for marriage set at 16 (previously the Church accepted marriage of girls of 12 and boys of 14).

I thought 1929 was correct, but now I don't know which to believe.
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-09-14, 16:11
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,669
Default

You are believing Ancestry above your own common sense?

Have Ancestry got their knickers in a twist somehow with consent of parents & Hardwicke's Act (a decade earlier!)?
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-09-14, 16:19
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,314
Default

Wow, that 1763 thing comes up on a lot of websites, but I haven't managed to figure out where they got it from yet.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-09-14, 16:21
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,314
Default

It even says it on Wikipedia but with no source cited.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-09-14, 16:26
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,314
Default

There is a possible explanation on here:
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.co...-01/1358211285

Good luck correcting this all over the internet!
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-09-14, 16:44
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,314
Default

And I'm sure it's just a coincidence that the United Nations' "Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages", which was agreed in 1962 and came into force in 1964, was convention number 1763 and had 16 signatories. I'm sure someone didn't scribble down some notes about this once which said "1763 - minimum marriage age - 16" and then when they came to write them up, completely misremember what it was about!!
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-09-14, 18:11
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,856
Default

Oh, I'm sure there was a period in the interregnum when the minimum age for marriage was raised to 16, but this was totally ignored by the church when they started to perform marriages again because it was not THEIR law.

But that's not 1763, is it.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-09-14, 18:55
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
You are believing Ancestry above your own common sense?
Erm...............


Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
Good luck correcting this all over the internet!
I don't need luck because I'm not doing it

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
And I'm sure it's just a coincidence that the United Nations' "Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages", which was agreed in 1962 and came into force in 1964, was convention number 1763 and had 16 signatories. I'm sure someone didn't scribble down some notes about this once which said "1763 - minimum marriage age - 16" and then when they came to write them up, completely misremember what it was about!!
lolol

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olde Crone View Post
I'm sure there was a period in the interregnum when the minimum age for marriage was raised to 16.

But that's not 1763, is it.

OC
No
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-09-14, 19:04
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,856
Default

Gottit!

"According to an act of parliament passed on 29th September 1653, the legal age of marriage for males was raised to 16 and females to 14. This act was replealed in 1660 and the former ecclesiastical laws returned, i.e. 12 for girls, 14 for boys"

OC
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26-09-14, 09:18
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,856
Default

Sorry, I hadn't read Kate's link when I posted above!

OC
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.