Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-08-14, 16:12
Sue at the seaside Sue at the seaside is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dorset
Posts: 411
Default an adoption question....

I'm doing some research for a friend and......
The mother was married twice (first husband died) she had a child recorded on BMD with 2nd Husband's surname and her previous married surname, But this was a year before they actually married.
There is also a record in the same quarter with her 1st husband's surname and her maiden name. (first husband was defo dead by then!)
Is this conclusive (well as near as you can be) proof of formal adoption?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-08-14, 16:23
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,314
Default

No, I would say that it means that the second husband was the biological father of the child and went along with the mother to register the birth, or perhaps she went on her own but was calling herself by his surname so she put both surnames down for herself, e.g. Mary Smith otherwise Brown, formerly Wilson.

Edit - if you get a copy of the birth certificate it should say "adopted" on it if the child was subsequently adopted.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-08-14, 16:26
Sue at the seaside Sue at the seaside is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dorset
Posts: 411
Default

Could that explain the 2 distinct entries, the one with her 1st husband's name doesn't have the middle initial, but the one with the 2nd husband's name does
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-08-14, 16:41
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,314
Default

Do you want to PM me the details, Sue, and I'll have a look at the index entries?
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-08-14, 16:51
Sue at the seaside Sue at the seaside is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dorset
Posts: 411
Default

He is dead, but perhaps a PM would be better
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-08-14, 17:22
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,314
Default

Ah, there are three index entries: the original registration, under her first husband's surname, then what looks to be a re-registration a few years later, presumably after the mother's second marriage, and a handwritten addition to the index for the quarter when he was born, with a note to see the re-registration entry. It looks to me as though the birth was originally registered without the father's name on and then was re-registered after the parents' marriage. But this does not mean he was adopted, as the adoption index is separate and not available online. The references for the later registration just look to be normal birth register refs.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-08-14, 17:34
Sue at the seaside Sue at the seaside is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dorset
Posts: 411
Default

Thanks for looking, that sounds very complicated. I only noticed last night that her first child was born 7 days after her marriage, so she cut things fine!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:34.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.