Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25-05-14, 11:57
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,346
Default 1841 census lookup

Edward Peacock was buried at Thurleigh, Beds on 22 Oct 1841 aged 64 (so b abt 1777) (source NBI)

Can anyone find him on the 1841 census or anywhere else?

I have a marriage for Ann Smith (spinster, unknown age, but dau of Joseph Smith and Lydia Lavender who were married at Pavenham Beds in 1752) to widower, Edward Peacock of Thurleigh, in 1802 at St Paul's Bedford (Bedford PR index CD).

Ann and Edward Peacock was mentioned in the will of Ann's brother James Smith in 1828. (they were said to be of Oakley, Beds)

Both mentioned again in another brothers will in 1829 (no place)

Ann was mentioned in another brothers will in 1830 (no place)

No mention of Ann in another brothers will in 1834

I don't know if Ann and Edward had children.

I'm trying to decide if the 1841 burial is the right Edward Peacock.
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-05-14, 12:40
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,315
Default

Some of the names in Thurleigh are pretty difficult or impossible to make out.

There is a William Peacock age 9 (just so we can find him again if we need him.)
1841 census

And I think this is an Edward Peacock in Oakley but he is age 20 (bottom of left hand page). With Rebecca age 25:
1841 census
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-05-14, 12:43
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,315
Default

There is an Edward Peacock at Ravensden but he is age 50:
1841 census
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-05-14, 12:44
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,346
Default

This Edward:

PEACOCK EDWARD b abt 1751 bur 6 Feb 1827 Deaths & burials Thurleigh, Bedfordshire, England (NBI)

has a death duty index record which says his exor is William Peacock of Oakley. If this Edward was the husband of Ann then it would be surprising that he isn't mentioned as dec'd in a will written by his brother-in-law in June 1827.

Or wouldn't it be surprising?
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-05-14, 12:44
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
There is an Edward Peacock at Ravensden but he is age 50:
1841 census
Hmmm.....that was the only one I could find who was even middle-aged
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-05-14, 12:46
HarrysMum's Avatar
HarrysMum HarrysMum is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,212
Default

Sorry, can't find an Edward in Beds.....or an Ann who looks right. Did find a Lydia (clutching at straws) but Peacock was her married name.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-05-14, 12:51
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,315
Default

Edward Peacock is listed as a freeholder in Thurleigh, residence Oakley, in the 1807 Poll Book:
1807 Poll Book
And in 1820, residence Thurleigh:
1820 Poll Book
Not listed in 1831.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-05-14, 12:56
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merry View Post
This Edward:

PEACOCK EDWARD b abt 1751 bur 6 Feb 1827 Deaths & burials Thurleigh, Bedfordshire, England (NBI)

has a death duty index record which says his exor is William Peacock of Oakley. If this Edward was the husband of Ann then it would be surprising that he isn't mwentioned as dec'd in a will written by his brother-in-law in June 1827.

Or wouldn't it be surprising?
The will says "Ann Peacock the Wife of Edward Peacock at Oakley farmer in the County of Bedford", rather than leaving anything to Edward himself, so I suppose it could be a mistake where they put Wife instead of Widow. Or perhaps copied out wrong.

Also, do you think there's something a bit funny about the date that James Smith's will was signed? It looks to me as though "seven" is crossed out but nothing written in to replace it? So is it supposed to be 1820?
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-05-14, 13:37
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,346
Default

Sorry, just finished my roast beef!!

I hadn't noticed that regarding the date of James' will. I'd written 16th June 1827 in my notes Just going to have another look now.......

Libby, Lydia Peacock (Smith) was the sister of Ann Peacock (Smith), but I am not yet sure of the relationship between Edward and Samuel Peacock.
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-05-14, 13:43
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,346
Default

Hmmm....re James Smith's will - I suppose the crossing out of seven must be meant and if it was supposed to be replaced by another number but the clerk forgot, then the will must have been signed between 1821 and 1826 inc or 1820 if the correction is right. Whatever the case, the will was probably written before Edward Peacock died. So thanks for pointing that out, Kate.

James Smith was killed by a cow.
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:53.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.