Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14-02-13, 16:42
Shona's Avatar
Shona Shona is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oop nerth and darn sarf
Posts: 3,026
Default What ever happened to Sarah Jane?

Sarah Jane Nash - my great gandmother's sister, was born in Burlescombe, Devon. She appears in the 1861 census:

James Nash, 40, ag lab, b North Petherton, Somerset
Jane Nash, 38, born Burlescombe, Devon
William Nash, 13, ag lab, born West Monkton, Somerset
Mary Ann, 9, born West Monkton, Somerset
John Nash, 7, born Burlescombe, Devon
Charlotte Nash, 1, born Tiverton, Devon

I can't find her on the 1871 census.

Sarah Jane Nash gave birth to a son, Arthur, on 17 March 1876 in Tiverton Workhouse. She wasn't married and no father is named on the birth certificate.

I can find no trace of her after that.

In 1881, Arthur was with his grandparents, James and Jane Nash in Stoodleigh, Devon. He is also with them in 1891 in Tiverton.

Any thoughts?

Off to cook now. Will check in later.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-02-13, 17:25
vallee's Avatar
vallee vallee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 644
Default

you dont say when she was born ??? I cannot find her in 1861 to get an idea
__________________

Vallee
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-02-13, 17:27
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,319
Default

Sorry, Shona, I couldn't figure out from your post when she was born or which one of those she was in the 1861 census so I had to look it up:

Bolham, Tiverton, Devon
James Naish Head Mar 40 Agri Laborer Somerset No Petherton
Jane Naish Wife Mar 38 Do Wife Devon Burlescombe
William Naish Son Unm 13 Do Somerset West Monkton
Mary Ann Naish Daur 9 Do Do
John Naish Son 7 Devon Burlscombe
Sarah Jane Naish Dau 4 Do Do
Charlotte Naish Dau 1 Do Do
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-02-13, 17:30
vallee's Avatar
vallee vallee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 644
Default

just found 1861 no wonder I couldn't they are transcribed as Naish on FMP ? off to see what I can find
__________________

Vallee
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-02-13, 17:43
Shona's Avatar
Shona Shona is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oop nerth and darn sarf
Posts: 3,026
Default

Oooops!

*blushes and scuttles back to the kitchen*
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-02-13, 18:40
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,319
Default

I'm having no luck with her.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-02-13, 19:50
Shona's Avatar
Shona Shona is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oop nerth and darn sarf
Posts: 3,026
Default

Thanks for trying. I appreciate others having a look in case there was something I had missed.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-02-13, 21:35
vallee's Avatar
vallee vallee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 644
Default

sorry nor me there are so many its hard to pin her down, do you think she married?
__________________

Vallee
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-02-13, 10:10
Shona's Avatar
Shona Shona is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oop nerth and darn sarf
Posts: 3,026
Default

I've been tracing Sarah's son, Arthur Nash, to see if that provides any clues.

Although named Arthur in the 1871 and 1881 censuses, his full name was Thomas Arthur Nash.

In 1881, he worked for the railways. He moved to London, where he worked as a doorman and barman.

On 16 February 1913, he married Lavinia Parratt at St Mark's Clerkenwell. The image is on Ancestry. Thomas Arthur was 36 and Lavinia was 33. He named his father as James Nash, farm labourer. I think this must be his grandfather - as he (as Arthur) appeared on the 1881 and 1891 censuses with his grandparents.

Do others agree that James on the marriage record was his grandfather?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-02-13, 10:12
Shona's Avatar
Shona Shona is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oop nerth and darn sarf
Posts: 3,026
Default

I think Thomas Arthur Nash must have served in WW1. While the couple married in 1915, their first child, Lavinia May Nash, wasn't born until 1919.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.