Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-12, 22:59
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,685
Default Are these sigs the same?

John Hanham, witness at the marriage of William Bryant in Hamworthy, Dorset in 1838:

http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?h...=&pid=20559804

and John Hanham junior, marrying in Shaftesbury in 1836:

http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?h...c=&pid=4949778
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-12, 23:23
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,685
Default

Logically, that first signature should be the same as this one:

http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?h...id&pid=1495325

since that appears to be William's sister, but it doesn't look right.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-12-12, 06:04
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,354
Default

The first two are a lot more similar than the last, but that's quite a gap in time to maintain a sig if he didn't write much! Did JJH forget his middle name for the rest of his life?

I can't see John and Sarah after their marriage,
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-12-12, 06:58
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,317
Default

The first two look very similar and the third one very different.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-12-12, 07:52
Lindsay Lindsay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 898
Default

Did you notice James Hanham is a witness on the previous marriage in 1836?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-12-12, 08:04
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,685
Default

Thanks, guys, that's exactly what I thought.

I had always assumed (dangerous territory!) that John Hanham was a parish clerk/employer because of his signature being so good.

Shaftesbury is the opposite side of the county to Hamworthy, near Poole. The John Hanhams there, father and son, were masons (and the younger one a cordwainer, possibly taking over his father's business. But they appear, on censuses at least, to be staying put.

JJ Hanham has several Ancestry trees and in 1851 he (down as plain John) is shown as born in Morden, with Sarah born in Hamworthy. They have an eleven year old Sarah Hanham, daughter with them.

Sarah Bryant, daughter of Sarah Bryant was baptised in Hamworthy (I think in 1838). Needless to say, I cannot find Sarah senior, her daughter nor John Hanham in 1841. They could well be in the East End of London, or Stratford, Essex by then. The trees I looked at hadn't found any of them in 1841 either.

It is quite possible that the witness is a relation (uncle etc) of JJ Hanham, but I can't find any other sigs to compare as yet.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-12-12, 08:06
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsay View Post
Did you notice James Hanham is a witness on the previous marriage in 1836?
Yes, Lindsay. And William Bryant and Susanna Moors are cousins, which suggests he was a family friend.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-12-12, 08:41
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,354
Default

Quote:
JJ Hanham has several Ancestry trees and in 1851 he (down as plain John) is shown as born in Morden, with Sarah born in Hamworthy. They have an eleven year old Sarah Hanham, daughter with them.
I did see them, but excluded them because of all those children when they had only been married a year (by 1851) and neither of them apparently previously married and no obvious connection with where they married. I accidentally read the marriage occ as coachman rather than coachmaker - if I'd realised I'd got that wrong then perhaps I might have worked it out!!
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:05.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.