PDA

View Full Version : Lost - Hugh Henry and Eliza Jane Bailey


ElizabethHerts
06-10-14, 10:50
Hugh Henry Bailey married Eliza Jane Parker at St Mary's Portsea, Hampshire, on 15 June 1843 and I'm struggling to find them after this.

Any sightings most welcome!

kiterunner
06-10-14, 12:02
FamilySearch has the baptism of a James William Bailey 14 Apr 1844 at Titchfield, Hampshire, parents Hugh Henry and Eliza Jane.

kiterunner
06-10-14, 12:07
So this is them in 1851:
1851 census on ancestry (http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/8860/SSXHO107_1643_1643-0463/1773560?backurl=http%3a%2f%2fsearch.ancestry.co.uk %2fcgi-bin%2fsse.dll%3fMS_AdvCB%3d1%26db%3duki1851%26rank %3d1%26new%3d1%26MSAV%3d2%26msT%3d1%26gss%3dangs-d%26gsfn%3dja*s%26gsfn_x%3dXO%26gsln%3dba*l*y%26gs ln_x%3dXO%26msbdy%3d1845%26msbdy_x%3d1%26gskw%3dha *s*%26gskw_x%3d1%26dbOnly%3d_F0006867%257c_F000686 7_x%252c_F0006301%257c_F0006301_x%252c_F0005DFD%25 7c_F0005DFD_x%252c_83004006%257c_83004006_x%252c_F 0005906%257c_F0005906_x%252c_F0005E11%257c_F0005E1 1_x%252c_F0005C4F%257c_F0005C4F_x%252c_F0005DFC%25 7c_F0005DFC_x%252c_F0005DFB%257c_F0005DFB_x%26uidh %3dvm5%26msbdp%3d2%26gl%3d%26gst%3d%26hc%3d10%26fh %3d20%26fsk%3dBEDczMwIgAAinAAKnjI-61-&ssrc=&backlabel=ReturnSearchResults)
94 High St, Lewes, Sussex
Hugh H Bailey Head Mar 29 Coach body & carriage maker journeyman Hants Salisbury
Eliza J Bailey Wife Mar 25 Milliner Do Fareham
James W Bailey Son 7 Scholar Do Southampton

kiterunner
06-10-14, 12:13
And in Hastings in 1861, still just the one child:
http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/8767/SSXRG9_561_565-0046/7512240?backurl=http%3a%2f%2fsearch.ancestry.co.uk %2fcgi-bin%2fsse.dll%3fdb%3duki1861%26so%3d2%26pcat%3d186 1UKI%26MS_AdvCB%3d1%26rank%3d1%26new%3d1%26MSAV%3d 2%26msT%3d1%26gss%3dangs-c%26gsfn%3dja*s%26gsfn_x%3dXO%26gsln%3dba*l*y%26gs ln_x%3dXO%26msbdy%3d1845%26msbdy_x%3d1%26gskw%3dha *s*%26gskw_x%3d1%26uidh%3dvm5%26msbdp%3d2&ssrc=&backlabel=ReturnSearchResults

kiterunner
06-10-14, 12:16
1871:
http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/7619/SSXRG10_1031_1033-0277/12857713?backurl=http%3a%2f%2fsearch.ancestry.co.u k%2fcgi-bin%2fsse.dll%3fMS_AdvCB%3d1%26db%3duki1871%26rank %3d1%26new%3d1%26so%3d3%26MSAV%3d2%26msT%3d1%26gss %3dms_db%26gsfn%3dhugh%26gsfn_x%3dXO%26gsln%3dba*l *y%26gsln_x%3dXO%26msbdy%3d1822%26msbdy_x%3d1%26gs kw%3dha*s*%26gskw_x%3d1%26dbOnly%3d_F0003888%257c_ F0003888_x%26dbOnly%3d_F00027B9%257c_F00027B9_x%26 dbOnly%3d_F0003039%257c_F0003039_x%26dbOnly%3d_F00 0303A%257c_F000303A_x%26dbOnly%3d_F00032DB%257c_F0 0032DB_x%26dbOnly%3d_83004006%257c_83004006_x%26db Only%3d_F000303D%257c_F000303D_x%26dbOnly%3d_F0003 2F2%257c_F00032F2_x%26dbOnly%3d_F00032F6%257c_F000 32F6_x%26uidh%3dvm5%26msbdp%3d5&ssrc=&backlabel=ReturnSearchResults

ElizabethHerts
06-10-14, 12:23
Many thanks, Kate. I should have looked for them outside Hampshire.

My head is spinning with my Purkis family. I confirmed that I am descended from a James Purkis who was 49 when he died in 1834. I have found a likely baptism to a William and Ann Purkis in 1785 at St Mary Portsea. However, I'm having to trawl through all the baptisms, marriages and burials to establish who belongs to whom as there is obviously more than one couple called William and Ann Purkis (and variant spellings).