PDA

View Full Version : Some census image queries


Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:00
The reference is RG13; Piece: 4351; Folio: 151; Page: 46.
(1901)
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec/?htx=view&r=5538&dbid=7814&iid=YRKRG13_4350_4353-0593&fn=George&ln=Stacey&st=r&ssrc=&pid=27716974

In 1901, Thomas and Elizabeth Rathbone are living with two of their children, John Silas and Lucy Mabel -

If this is right, Elizabeth would have been about 54 when Lucy was born. Is this likely ? - ---- ****Edit** Please ignore this bit - my maths is rubbish - she would have been 44!!!

Also I am having difficulty reading some of the occupations -

Thomas Rathbone - retired cordwainer Boston?

George Stacey ( the lodger who went on to marry Lucy) - Is his occupation horse something Boston ?

Also, next door, live Ruth and William Babbington (Ruth was another of Thomas and Elizabeth's children. I cannot make out William's occupation - Manager (Grocer) ... ?

Thank you for any help

HarrysMum
09-10-09, 10:09
I make Elizabeth 64 and Lucy 20, so Elizabeth would have been 44.

Back in a mo.

HarrysMum
09-10-09, 10:09
When did you put that 'edit' in....lol

I'm going mad..

Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:14
When did you put that 'edit' in....lol

I'm going mad..

No it's me that's going mad:o

Sorry Libby :o

HarrysMum
09-10-09, 10:14
Thomas looks like retired cordwainer Boston.

For George I can see horse ? but nothing else fits in.........

William looks like Manager Process ??? Then there is a word above Manager but below Horse? and I can't work out which person it's for.

So I'm useless at this....lol

Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:18
Thanks for looking, Libby :) - yes it does look like process

And sorry for any confusion!

It's terrible writing on the record

HarrysMum
09-10-09, 10:19
Wouldn't be "horse breaker" would it??? Doesn't seem to be enough letters, but the one above is dressmaker and the last past after the "horse" bit is the same. The letters below are "sint" I think. Maybe "horse" is wrong but it starts with H.

Rachel
09-10-09, 10:21
Wold that be Retired Cordwainer and the word Bootm (Bootmaker) over the top ?

HarrysMum
09-10-09, 10:23
Where is this census ? I'm looking somewhere else and lost it...... Just the county.

Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:25
Wouldn't be "horse breaker" would it??? Doesn't seem to be enough letters, but the one above is dressmaker and the last past after the "horse" bit is the same. The letters below are "sint" I think. Maybe "horse" is wrong but it starts with H.

Thanks Libby - that would fit I think, as George's father was a blacksmith :)

Wold that be Retired Cordwainer and the word Bootm (Bootmaker) over the top ?

Oh yes, I think that must be right Rachel, as he is a bootmaker in an earlier census - makes more sense than Boston!

Rachel
09-10-09, 10:32
Wonder if George is a Shoemaker ~ first letter could be an 'S'
If you compare it with William Sheldon 'Silver Plate Maker' and his son who's a 'Silver Candlestick Maker' it is similar and would make more sense ~ if that's 'Bootm' after his name too



Hmmmm ~ second thoughts ~ that might be Electro Plate Maker (William Sheldon)


Might the Grocer be 'Grocer Manager drywares' ? (bit of a guess)

HarrysMum
09-10-09, 10:37
Could be, Rachel............Can you make out what the "sint" word is????

Merry
09-10-09, 10:40
Apologies if I cover something aleady said! I can see:

Thomas Rathbone, Retired Cordwainer - Bootm (written over)
George Stacey, Shoemaker - Bootm
William Babington, Manager (something) Engraver

I'm working on the missing word! lol

HarrysMum
09-10-09, 10:42
That's the word I keep getting as "process" .

Rachel
09-10-09, 10:44
Could be, Rachel............Can you make out what the "sint" word is????
;( noooooooooo

Is Lyn A a member ? ~ she's a wizard when it comes to deciphering

Rachel
09-10-09, 10:51
Mmmm yes ~ Not 'Grocer' and yes agree something Engraver

Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:56
Thanks all - yes I think George is a shoemaker !

I think I found William in 1891 http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec/?htx=view&r=5538&dbid=6598&iid=WRYRG12_3808_3811-0246&fn=William+H&ln=Babbington&st=r&ssrc=pt_t45875_p-2138519518_g32768_r_h_l&pid=4023902 and he looks like a Prussian (?)collector of accounts!

Merry
09-10-09, 10:58
I thought that said Printers ;(

Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 11:00
Thanks Merry - that makes more sense :)