View Full Version : Some census image queries
Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:00
The reference is RG13; Piece: 4351; Folio: 151; Page: 46.
(1901)
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec/?htx=view&r=5538&dbid=7814&iid=YRKRG13_4350_4353-0593&fn=George&ln=Stacey&st=r&ssrc=&pid=27716974
In 1901, Thomas and Elizabeth Rathbone are living with two of their children, John Silas and Lucy Mabel -
If this is right, Elizabeth would have been about 54 when Lucy was born. Is this likely ? - ---- ****Edit** Please ignore this bit - my maths is rubbish - she would have been 44!!!
Also I am having difficulty reading some of the occupations -
Thomas Rathbone - retired cordwainer Boston?
George Stacey ( the lodger who went on to marry Lucy) - Is his occupation horse something Boston ?
Also, next door, live Ruth and William Babbington (Ruth was another of Thomas and Elizabeth's children. I cannot make out William's occupation - Manager (Grocer) ... ?
Thank you for any help
I make Elizabeth 64 and Lucy 20, so Elizabeth would have been 44.
Back in a mo.
When did you put that 'edit' in....lol
I'm going mad..
Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:14
When did you put that 'edit' in....lol
I'm going mad..
No it's me that's going mad:o
Sorry Libby :o
Thomas looks like retired cordwainer Boston.
For George I can see horse ? but nothing else fits in.........
William looks like Manager Process ??? Then there is a word above Manager but below Horse? and I can't work out which person it's for.
So I'm useless at this....lol
Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:18
Thanks for looking, Libby :) - yes it does look like process
And sorry for any confusion!
It's terrible writing on the record
Wouldn't be "horse breaker" would it??? Doesn't seem to be enough letters, but the one above is dressmaker and the last past after the "horse" bit is the same. The letters below are "sint" I think. Maybe "horse" is wrong but it starts with H.
Wold that be Retired Cordwainer and the word Bootm (Bootmaker) over the top ?
Where is this census ? I'm looking somewhere else and lost it...... Just the county.
Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:25
Wouldn't be "horse breaker" would it??? Doesn't seem to be enough letters, but the one above is dressmaker and the last past after the "horse" bit is the same. The letters below are "sint" I think. Maybe "horse" is wrong but it starts with H.
Thanks Libby - that would fit I think, as George's father was a blacksmith :)
Wold that be Retired Cordwainer and the word Bootm (Bootmaker) over the top ?
Oh yes, I think that must be right Rachel, as he is a bootmaker in an earlier census - makes more sense than Boston!
Wonder if George is a Shoemaker ~ first letter could be an 'S'
If you compare it with William Sheldon 'Silver Plate Maker' and his son who's a 'Silver Candlestick Maker' it is similar and would make more sense ~ if that's 'Bootm' after his name too
Hmmmm ~ second thoughts ~ that might be Electro Plate Maker (William Sheldon)
Might the Grocer be 'Grocer Manager drywares' ? (bit of a guess)
Could be, Rachel............Can you make out what the "sint" word is????
Apologies if I cover something aleady said! I can see:
Thomas Rathbone, Retired Cordwainer - Bootm (written over)
George Stacey, Shoemaker - Bootm
William Babington, Manager (something) Engraver
I'm working on the missing word! lol
That's the word I keep getting as "process" .
Could be, Rachel............Can you make out what the "sint" word is????
;( noooooooooo
Is Lyn A a member ? ~ she's a wizard when it comes to deciphering
Mmmm yes ~ Not 'Grocer' and yes agree something Engraver
Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 10:56
Thanks all - yes I think George is a shoemaker !
I think I found William in 1891 http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec/?htx=view&r=5538&dbid=6598&iid=WRYRG12_3808_3811-0246&fn=William+H&ln=Babbington&st=r&ssrc=pt_t45875_p-2138519518_g32768_r_h_l&pid=4023902 and he looks like a Prussian (?)collector of accounts!
I thought that said Printers ;(
Muggins in Sussex
09-10-09, 11:00
Thanks Merry - that makes more sense :)
vBulletin® v3.8.7 PL3, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.