Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-12, 09:11
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default Martha Chapman -nee Gooch?

It's looks obvious to me but can someone confirm for me that the Mary Ann Green that witnesses two of these marriages is the same as the Mary Ann Gooch who marries James Green.

James Green/Mary Ann Gooch
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?h...c=&pid=7849944

John Morden/Eliza Ann Gooch
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?h...c=&pid=7053824

Charles Chapman/Martha Gooch
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?h...c=&pid=6798433

The reason I'm doubting myself is that if I'm right it makes my 3x GtGrandmother 13 yrs old when she had my 2x gt grandmother!
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-12, 09:44
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,319
Default

The signatures look the same, but can you explain why it makes your 3xgt-grandmother 13 when she had your 2xg-grandmother, please?
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-12, 10:40
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

I should have qualified that statement by saying that she may have been only 13 if the marriage is the right one!

This is Martha in 3x ggp http://www.genealogistsforum.co.uk/f...ead.php?t=8890

The only marriage I can find is the one between Martha Gooch and Charles Chapman in 1835 but their eldest child (Mary Ann) was born in 1826 (baptised in 1828). There is a Martha Gooch b1813 (bapt. 1815) to a John and Mary Ann Gooch who also have two other daughters, Mary Ann and Eliza as in the above marriages. I'm confident that they are all the same family but still have reservations whether it's my Martha.

I can't see any other Charles and Martha Chapmans in 1841 and having just checked she states then that she was born in 1811....

I'd be happy for more input.

Off swimming now! Will check back later.
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-12, 11:01
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,319
Default

If it is the right couple and they got married in 1835 then quite a few of the children were born before the marriage. Could be because they had to wait until Martha was 21? Or it could be a different Martha who was the mother of the older children?
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-12, 12:30
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,356
Default

Maybe that is the right marriage but Martha was a cousin of the one whose bap you have seen? I see yours was b about 1802 according to the 1841 and 1851 census - what age does it say on her death cert?
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-12, 12:53
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

She died in Aug 1853 aged 52, Merry.

I obviously misremembered the dob in 1841 in my earlier post!

I have looked at this marriage before for Martha and Charles but could never definitely pin it to them. One of their sons was christened William Rumsby Chapman which I thought might be some sort of clue but I've never worked out the answer if it is!
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-03-12, 13:14
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,356
Default

Apart from the obvious bit of the marriage being significantly after the first child(ren) also the groom in that marriage didn't use his middle name. Was his middle name on his death record?
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-12, 13:27
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

I haven't got his death, Merry. The Charles James Chapman in the GRO index for 1852 is a 5mth old, son of a Robert Chapman. There are too many other Charles Chapmans for me to hazard a guess although it should be in the Shoreditch/St Lukes areas.
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-12, 13:58
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,356
Default

Pity she stopped having children just before civil reg
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-03-12, 17:15
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

I've been saying that for a long time!

I'll just have to keep the Gooch family on the back burner in case something turns up at a later date.....
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:28.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.