Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-09, 13:55
Hopeful's Avatar
Hopeful Hopeful is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Manchester
Posts: 20
Default James Blinston

James born 1843 Manchester married Ellen Longden born Manchester 1846 at Manchester Cathedral in 1865.

I have found them in 1901 but not 1871/81/91

Can someone please have a look for them
__________________
PAT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-09, 14:37
Elaine Elaine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 23
Default

1891 transcribed as Blimston
RG12; Piece: 3173; Folio 51; Page 3

1881 transcribed as Blinton
RG11; Piece: 3902; Folio: 25; Page: 45;
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-09, 14:41
Hopeful's Avatar
Hopeful Hopeful is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Manchester
Posts: 20
Default

Thanks Elaine........I am useless at finding people how do you do it?
__________________
PAT
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-09, 14:42
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,348
Default

They are Blimston in 1911 as well!
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-09, 14:48
Elaine Elaine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 23
Default

Not having much luck with 1871.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-09-09, 14:50
Elaine Elaine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 23
Default

Sometimes best to forget about the surname when you are searching Pat, particularly if it is one that can be easily mistranscribed.
I searched for Ellen born 1846 +/- 2 years, born Manchester, husband James - and then just scroll through for a possible mistranscription.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-09-09, 15:06
Hopeful's Avatar
Hopeful Hopeful is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Manchester
Posts: 20
Default

The 1881 census has answered what would have been my next question thanks
__________________
PAT
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:40.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.