#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It's child 3 who is the mystery child Merry. We know child 2 died in 1978. That's niece's hubby's great grandfather. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Merry
I've sent you a pm. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
That's a fair old spread of births - 5 children over 24 years.
Are you SURE the mother was the same woman throughout and not, um, the first wife's sister maybe? OC |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Could it be that some were born in between, abroad?
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, I was thinking child two would need to have been born near the end of the quarter for child three to have been registered in Q1 1931, but I don't think he was (end of Nov, which of course IS less than six weeks before the end of the quarter! *adjusts fingers*)
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
If child two was a twin, then his birth certificate would have the time of birth on it.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I have the birth cert for child 4, still living. The christening for child 1, still living in on Ancestry, same parents. Child 2 is dead, but has such a distinctive name that it would identify all of them. There are only 2 of that name, father and son. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
If the mother was born in 1901 then she would be 46 when the last child was born in 1947, certainly possible.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
I've just sent Merry the full story.
I'll PM it to Kate and OC as well. |
|
|