#11
|
||||
|
||||
Never mind, this is that 1841 family in 1851:
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...=successSource But the couple in post #9 are likely to be Mary's parents.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, Kite, it seems to be them and so close to the other addresses from the marriage certificate.
There are no other baptisms, so maybe Mary was their only child. Still looking for deaths/burials Last edited by marquette; 25-05-18 at 21:52. |
Tags |
to3g14 |
|
|