#1
|
||||
|
||||
Baby born 31 May registered Sept??
would you say its possible for a baby born 31 May and christened the 20th June to be registered in Sept quarter??? thanks
__________________
Vallee |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, they could have registered the birth in July and it would still come within the six week limit.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. My grandad was born on 29 May 1900, but registered in September qtr of that year.
__________________
"What you see depends on what you're looking for." Sue at Langley Vale |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
thanks both of you I might have found my lady under Eliza King instead of Keen right year right area
__________________
Vallee |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
My father wasn't registered for seven weeks and six days after his birth in 1920. I presume my grandfather would have had to pay a fine.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
thanks but now think the one I found isnt her after all .dont know why I can find her siblings christenings but not hers
__________________
Vallee |
|
|