Kate, I know that some PRs are a mess, but even when they aren't, FMP has made it even more difficult to search. They should just leave them as they are if they aren't indexing properly or transcribing them.
Here are the registers for Upton cum Kexby on LincstothePast:
General register
Date: 1563-1800 Collection: Lincolnshire Archives Reference: UPTON CUM KEXBY PAR/1/1
Marriages, with banns
Date: 1755-1812 Collection: Lincolnshire Archives Reference: UPTON CUM KEXBY PAR/1/4
Baptisms and burials
Date: 1801-1812 Collection: Lincolnshire Archives Reference: UPTON CUM KEXBY PAR/1/2
Marriages
Date: 1813-1836 Collection: Lincolnshire Archives Reference: UPTON CUM KEXBY PAR/1/5
Baptisms
Date: 1813-1860 Collection: Lincolnshire Archives Reference: UPTON CUM KEXBY PAR/1/3
FMP should have left the format like this, following the page sequence in the orginal registers.
|