PDA

View Full Version : A jilted bride, a thief and a multiple widow


Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 17:17
I've come across this fascinating story while researching Eliza Inman, the first cousin of my disreputable great-grandfather Arthur Inman.

Eliza (born Horton, W. Yorks in 1843) married a George Uttley in Bradford in 1872.

She'd had an illegitimate child, Mary Emma, in Bradford in 1870, who I assume wasn't George's as they were both free to marry at the time. No baptism found for Mary Emma, and the mmn is blank in the GRO index. Mary Emma died in 1885.

From 1841 George (bap. 1839 in Barnsley) was always living with his parents (Truelove and Eliza) and siblings. In 1861 and 1871 they were at 75 Bedford Street, Bradford, and Eliza and her family were close by at 52 Bedford Street in 1871. George was a stone mason.

In 1874 the following report appeared in the Yorkshire newspapers, which I suspect relates to the same George Uttley, but I can't prove it so far.

A George Uttley was engaged to Mary Battison. According to the report they were both from Swinton, but met in Royston, where the wedding was to be held. Mary's mother had arranged a lavish do at the local pub, the wedding party were due to meet there, but the groom failed to turn up. In preparation for the wedding he'd bought a suit on credit and borrowed a watch from an acquaintance. A passer-by, seeing the bride in floods of tears, offered to marry her himself. The bride eventually agreed, and her mother went off to tell the vicar, who said it unfortunately couldn't be done immediately (presumably it would have taken too long to get a licence in the right name). As the wedding breakfast had already been ordered, the new suitor said it would be a pity to waste it, the family agreed, mum put a sovereign behind the bar for liquor and a good time was had by all, except the owner of the watch.

I can't find any other reports of the incident, so presumably the law never caught up with George. I'm curious to know what happened to Mary Battison, but I can't find a likely marriage for her and I haven't found her on the censuses so far.

I wouldn't be surprised if the passer-by was a friend tipped off by George to take advantage of the situation.

George appears in the newspapers on two other occasions.

The first is in 1875, when he was accused of embezzling books that he was supposed to sell on commission. This is definitely my George, because his address is given as Bedford Street, Bradford. The case was dismissed after George's brother-in-law (possibly one of Eliza's brothers, who were living with her and their mother in Bedford Street in 1871) offered to repay part of the money.

The second case, which is particularly interesting, was in 1877, when George Uttley, 38, a mason, was charged with stealing a gold watch and guard from James Copperthwaite, a packer of Tyersal (nr Bradford). George and his wife (unnamed, but sure to be Eliza) were lodging with James, and Mrs Uttley was his housekeeper. James fell asleep drunk one night and found his watch and watchguard missing in the morning. George was said to have pawned the watch and sold the guard. He was committed for trial, and according to the criminal registers on Ancestry he was acquitted of larceny at Quarter Sessions, but I can't find a newspaper report of the acquittal. Presumably he or his wife alleged that James gave them the watch.

As he had form for stealing watches, my guess is that he's the same man who jilted Mary Battison. He and his parents and siblings were living in Bradford, so if the banns were read in Royston, probably nobody who knew him would have noticed. He was a stone mason, so perhaps he was working in the area when he met Mary.

This is probably George's death:

Deaths Mar 1878
UTTLEY George 38 Bramley 9b 245

I hoped to find a burial that confirmed his occupation, but I haven't found a matching burial for that death in the West Yorks records on Ancestry.

Then, in 1879, Eliza remarried, to none other than James Copperthwaite, a packer from Tyersal. She was 35, and he was 63.

I can't find any of them (James and Eliza Copperthwaite, Mary Emma Inman or George Uttley) on the 1881 census.

James died in 1885, and in 1886 Eliza married Carl Heinrich (aka Charles Henry) Stolz, a 48-year-old bachelor from the Cape of Good Hope, S. Africa.

Carl and Eliza were together in 1891, and he died in 1894. Eliza outlived all her husbands by many years. She was a boarding house keeper in 1901 and a part-time mother's help in 1911. She eventually died in 1925.

None of her husbands lasted very long (about 6 years on average). I'm particularly curious to know what George died of, but I can't see anything in the papers, so presumably it was natural causes. I don't think I can really justify buying the death cert.

So to sum up, what I'd still like to find is:

- a burial for George Uttley in 1878

- a newspaper report of George's trial at the West Riding Quarter Sessions in Wakefield on 2/4/1877 (edited).

- an 1881 census entry for Eliza and James Copperthwaite and Mary Emma Inman

- what happened to Mary Battison (but it's just curiosity, as she isn't part of my tree).

There's a 12-year-old Mary Emma Inman, daughter, with a Clayton family in 1881, but I've ruled her out, because the Clayton in question married an Inman.

Copperthwaite is really badly transcribed on most of the censuses.

I'll put the census references in a separate post in case anyone wants to have a look.

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 17:34
Newspaper reports:

Sheffield Daily Telegraph 01 August 1874
http://search.findmypast.co.uk/bna/viewarticle?id=bl%2f0000250%2f18740801%2f035

Yorkshire Post and Leeds Intelligencer 02 August 1875
http://search.findmypast.co.uk/bna/viewarticle?id=bl%2f0000686%2f18750802%2f030

Leeds Times 31 March 1877
http://search.findmypast.co.uk/bna/viewarticle?id=bl%2f0000336%2f18770331%2f008

kiterunner
05-03-17, 17:38
I assume this is James in the 1881 electoral register?
http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/3057/40759_1831115184_1763-01483/53156103?backurl=&ssrc=&backlabel=Return
Oak cottage, Building ground, Tyersall, near Bradford.
And he is still listed there in 1882, so you would think they would be there on the 1881 census. Off for another look...

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 17:44
Censuses:

Eliza Inman, 1871
http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/7619/WRYRG10_4448_4451-0395/25935845?backurl=&ssrc=&backlabel=Return

James Copperthwaite, 1871
http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/7619/WRYRG10_4474_4478-0211/26022042?backurl=&ssrc=&backlabel=Return

George Uttley, 1871
http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/7619/WRYRG10_4448_4451-0406/25936107?backurl=&ssrc=&backlabel=Return

Eliza and Carl Stolz, 1891
http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/6598/WRYRG12_3639_3642-0595/6612523?backurl=&ssrc=&backlabel=Return

The image on Ancestry is practically illegible, but the one on FMP is much better:
http://search.findmypast.co.uk/record?id=gbc%2f1891%2f3641%2f0237&parentid=gbc%2f1891%2f0025133372&highlights=%22%22

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 17:48
I assume this is James in the 1881 electoral register?
Oak cottage, Building ground, Tyersall, near Bradford.
And he is still listed there in 1882, so you would think they would be there on the 1881 census. Off for another look...

Yes, that'll be him, I think. On the earlier censuses he was with his first wife Sarah, but she died in 1874.

kiterunner
05-03-17, 17:49
I found a website which has an index to the Tyersall 1881 census but I can't find Building Ground in it, never mind Oak Cottage.
http://www.calverley.info/cen_pud_1881_ed22.htm

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 17:52
How annoying. That Calverley website is quite good; I used it a lot before the West Yorks PRs went online.

kiterunner
05-03-17, 17:58
The description of ED19 says it includes the Building Ground (assuming there was only one!):
http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/7572/WRYRG11_4480_4484-0829/24630142?backurl=&ssrc=&backlabel=Return#?imageId=WRYRG11_4480_4484-0822

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 18:18
Yes, I'd just started ploughing through District 19, but I haven't found the building ground yet.

kiterunner
05-03-17, 18:18
- a newspaper report of George's trial at the West Riding Quarter Sessions in Wakefield on 2/4/1887



Can you confirm this date, please, Mary? Is it supposed to be 2nd April 1877?

kiterunner
05-03-17, 18:23
Oh, here is a newspaper report of the acquittal (4th column, near the top), but it doesn't give details:
http://search.findmypast.co.uk/bna/viewarticle?id=bl%2f0000250%2f18770405%2f046

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 18:30
Sorry, 1877 is correct.

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 18:31
Oh, here is a newspaper report of the acquittal (4th column, near the top), but it doesn't give details:
http://search.findmypast.co.uk/bna/viewarticle?id=bl%2f0000250%2f18770405%2f046


Ah, well done, I'd missed that. How annoying not to know the reason!

Merry
05-03-17, 19:18
Might this be the jilted bride in 1861?:

http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/8767/WRYRG9_3442_3445-0184?pid=10731790&backurl=http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?_phsrc%3DcyS389%26_phstart%3DsuccessSource %26usePUBJs%3Dtrue%26indiv%3D1%26db%3Duki1861%26gs s%3Dangs-d%26new%3D1%26rank%3D1%26msT%3D1%26MS_AdvCB%3D1%26 gsln%3Dbat*son%26gsln_x%3D1%26gskw%3Droystone%2523 %26gskw_x%3D1%26cpxt%3D1%26cp%3D11%26catbucket%3Dr stp%26MSAV%3D2%26uidh%3D672%26pcat%3D35%26fh%3D0%2 6h%3D10731790%26recoff%3D%26ml_rpos%3D1&treeid=&personid=&hintid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=cyS389&_phstart=successSource&usePUBJs=true

She was registered in Doncaster district in 1854.

Merry
05-03-17, 19:30
Her mmn was Noble and Jonathan Battison married Sarah Noble in 1843 I already saw them in the area in 1861. Mary was a servant in Churwell and Morley in 1871. I can't find her mother in 1871 yet though. Her father died in 1870 (Doncaster district)

HarrysMum
05-03-17, 19:53
I love your Inmans, Mary. Just throwing that in for no particular reason.

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 20:16
I don't know if you get the Jeremy Kyle show in Aus, but they would be prime candidates :)

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 20:17
Well done Merry, that Mary Battison looks good.

Merry
05-03-17, 20:38
I still can't find Sarah Battison (Mary's mother) in 1871. The couple Mary was with in 1861 should be William Firth and Hannah Battison according to their marriage in 1859, but William's wife is called Martha!! I wondered if Mary was with them long term and if Martha/Hannah was the 'mother' who paid for the reception. Martha was in Roystone in 1871.

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 21:02
I've found a Mary married to a Samuel Uttley living in Mexborough 1881, but I think it's probably a coincidence; she was born in Kilnhurst, very near the Swinton mentioned in the cutting, but she's described as the daughter of the Joseph and Sarah Dickinson they're living with.

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 21:30
I've found that Mary with her parents in 1871 now, so it is just a coincidence.

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 21:42
I still can't find Sarah Battison (Mary's mother) in 1871. The couple Mary was with in 1861 should be William Firth and Hannah Battison according to their marriage in 1859, but William's wife is called Martha!

I'm getting hopelessly confused by this lot.

I was looking for a remarriage for Sarah Battison née Noble after Jonathan died in 1870, and I found this one:

Marriages Mar 1871
Adey Charles Rotherham 9c 559
Battison Sarah Rotherham 9c 559

Can't see it among the West Yorks PRs.

Anyway, in the 1871 census there's a Charles Adey in Mexborough with wife Hannah... whose details match the Sarah Battison with Jonathan in 1861 :confused:
And there's an 11-year-old "son-in-law" William Battison living with them, who was with Jonathan and Sarah in 1861.

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 22:07
Ah, she changes her name back to Sarah in 1881.

Mary from Italy
05-03-17, 22:41
OK, Jonathan Battison and William Firth's wife Hannah aka Martha were brother and sister, but she was actually baptised Martha.

They were the children of George and Ruth Battison; Jonathan was baptised in Wath upon Dearne in 1812, and Martha in Thurscoe in 1830, so Jonathan's daughter Mary was indeed her niece. George and Ruth don't seem to have had a daughter Hannah.

I wonder why both Sarah Noble and Martha Battison used the name Hannah, though?

Merry
06-03-17, 05:45
I wonder why both Sarah Noble and Martha Battison used the name Hannah, though?

To make things difficult for us, I expect!

vita
06-03-17, 15:45
Can you imagine agreeing to marry someone who just happened to be passing by the

church? Bear in mind, if OH hadn't turned up that day in August 1980 & Monty Don

happened to be passing ............

James18
06-03-17, 15:49
Can you imagine agreeing to marry someone who just happened to be passing by the

church? Bear in mind, if OH hadn't turned up that day in August 1980 & Monty Don

happened to be passing ............
Does OH know just how disposable he is? :D

vita
07-03-17, 10:51
Does OH know just how disposable he is? :D

Shush, James - lets keep it our little secret(!)

Kit
12-03-17, 06:16
I had to google Monty Don but your OH is a lucky man. Monty appears to have been available to step into his shoes back in 1980. :)

This is very interesting Mary. I hope you get your answers