Just Gillian
18-11-15, 07:54
According to the Oxford University and City Herald of 9th April 1825 -
"On Monday last was married Mr Thomas Haines, coach maker, son of the late Mr Robert Haines of St Ebbe’s, in this city, to Miss Salomoni, daughter of Mr Salmoni of St Clement’s."
Marriage Register St Bride, City of London (couple's names and witnesses only) -
3rd December 1826 Thomas Haines married Elizabeth Salmoni
Elizabeth was born c1807. Thomas had died before Elizabeth's marriage to her second husband in 1836 so I have no details about him.
I think the most likely explanation for the apparent second marriage of Thomas and Elizabeth is that the notice had been sent to the Oxford paper in advance but then did not go ahead for some reason. Elizabeth would have been about 18 in 1825 but, as the marriage appeared in the paper, she would presumably have had the consent of her father, and Thomas's father was dead.
Catholic baptisms have been found for most of her siblings, both older and younger. Several of her siblings' marriages were posted in one of the Oxford newspapers, both before and after her own, and each of those named the church where the marriage took place. However, I notice no church is named in Elizabeth's announcement.
The 1753 Marriage Act would still have been in force in 1825 so I'm guessing that if Elizabeth had a clandestine Catholic marriage no notice of the event would have been published. I have found no children of the marriage and can think of no reason why the couple would need to remarry in London.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
"On Monday last was married Mr Thomas Haines, coach maker, son of the late Mr Robert Haines of St Ebbe’s, in this city, to Miss Salomoni, daughter of Mr Salmoni of St Clement’s."
Marriage Register St Bride, City of London (couple's names and witnesses only) -
3rd December 1826 Thomas Haines married Elizabeth Salmoni
Elizabeth was born c1807. Thomas had died before Elizabeth's marriage to her second husband in 1836 so I have no details about him.
I think the most likely explanation for the apparent second marriage of Thomas and Elizabeth is that the notice had been sent to the Oxford paper in advance but then did not go ahead for some reason. Elizabeth would have been about 18 in 1825 but, as the marriage appeared in the paper, she would presumably have had the consent of her father, and Thomas's father was dead.
Catholic baptisms have been found for most of her siblings, both older and younger. Several of her siblings' marriages were posted in one of the Oxford newspapers, both before and after her own, and each of those named the church where the marriage took place. However, I notice no church is named in Elizabeth's announcement.
The 1753 Marriage Act would still have been in force in 1825 so I'm guessing that if Elizabeth had a clandestine Catholic marriage no notice of the event would have been published. I have found no children of the marriage and can think of no reason why the couple would need to remarry in London.
Does anyone have any suggestions?