Hannah Pinkard

[vita]

Name - "Official" name and what they were known as

Hannah Pinkard

Date and place of birth

1802 Stoke Goldington, Buckinghamshire

Names of parents

Not known

Date and place of baptism - if applicable

Not known

Details of each of his or her marriages - if any

Richard Adderson Pearson 1822 Piddington, Northamptonshire

Occupation(s) - if any

Lace maker

Addresses where they lived - and please list which censuses you have or

haven't found him/her on

1841

Not found

1851 6 West St. Islington

1861 10 Vittoria St. Islington

1871 10 Vittoria St. Islington

Date and place of burial/cremation

1874 Islington

Details of will/administration of their estate - if applicable

Not known

Memorial Inscription - if any

Not known

[Merry]

This is the nearest Hannah I can find:


Name: Hannah Pinkard
Gender: Female
Baptism Date: 13 Nov 1808
Baptism Place: Stoke Goldington,Buckingham,England
Father: Samuel Pinkard
Mother: Sarah

[Merry]

This marriage is in the next door parish:


Name: Samuel Pinkard
Gender: Male
Marriage Date: 12 Oct 1807
Marriage Place: Gayhurst,Buckingham,England
Spouse: Sarah Clark

[Merry]

I would imagine the child bap in 1808 would be a baby of no more than a few months as it seems very likely she was the child of the couple married in 1807. Makes her rather young at marriage if it's the same Hannah - do you have a copy of the original marriage entry?

[kiterunner]

This is the 1841 census:
1841 census on ancestry (http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/8978/MDXHO107_664_664-0582/7055410?backurl=http%3a%2f%2fsearch.ancestry.co.uk %2fcgi-bin%2fsse.dll%3fMS_AdvCB%3d1%26db%3duki1841%26rank %3d1%26new%3d1%26MSAV%3d2%26msT%3d1%26gss%3dangs-d%26gsfn%3djane%26gsfn_x%3dXO%26gsln%3dpe*s*n%26gs ln_x%3dXO%26msbdy%3d1836%26msbdy_x%3d1%26dbOnly%3d _F000391C%257c_F000391C_x%252c_F0003039%257c_F0003 039_x%252c_F000303A%257c_F000303A_x%252c_F00032DB% 257c_F00032DB_x%252c_F0002996%257c_F0002996_x%252c _F000303D%257c_F000303D_x%252c_F000303E%257c_F0003 03E_x%26uidh%3dvm5%26msbdp%3d2%26gl%3d%26gst%3d%26 hc%3d10%26fh%3d10%26fsk%3dBEDmZmYIgAAjEgCYkFE-61-&ssrc=&backlabel=ReturnSearchResults)
Hornsey back cottages, St Mary Islington East, Middlesex
Richard Pearson 40
Hannah Do 38
Richard Do 15
John Do 12
Jane Do 6
Mary Do 4
Willm Do 1

[kiterunner]

Richard and Hannah's marriage is transcribed on FreeREG but doesn't say anything about Hannah's age on there. Witnesses were John Pinkard and Mary Ann Pearson.

[kiterunner]

FamilySearch has the burial of a Hannah Pinkard at Stoke Goldington 11 Sep 1826, but annoyingly enough it doesn't give her age and it doesn't seem to be on FMP or FreeREG, so no way to tell whether it could be the one who was baptised in 1808.

[vita]

Thanks Merry & Kite - I don't think Samuel & Sarah are my Hannah's parents. Everything

I've seen records her b as 1802.I had a feeling this might prove a difficult one -

Stoke Goldington seems to have been full of Pinkards for the last few hundred years.

Pretty sure witness Mary Ann Pearson would have been Richard's sister, a couple of years

younger than him.

[catfordcrooner]

John Pinkard was a witness at the marriage I believe
Have found these - all Stoke Goldington:
Ann bapt. 31.3.1796
Susannah bapt. 25.3.1798
Elizabeth bapt. 13.9.1801
Parents John and Elizabeth Pinkard
She could be a sibling or could have used the name Hannah instead of Elizabeth
The 1808 Hannah can be ruled out because she would have been 14 when married

[vita]

John Pinkard was a witness at the marriage I believe
Have found these - all Stoke Goldington:
Ann bapt. 31.3.1796
Susannah bapt. 25.3.1798
Elizabeth bapt. 13.9.1801
Parents John and Elizabeth Pinkard
She could be a sibling or could have used the name Hannah instead of Elizabeth
The 1808 Hannah can be ruled out because she would have been 14 when married

Thanks CC - agree re ruling out 1808 Hannah. Trouble is, the area seems to

have had more Pinkards than you could shake a stick at. Identifying the right

one looks to be quite challenge.

[Merry]

The 1808 Hannah can be ruled out because she would have been 14 when married

If she was a baby at baptism.

I wouldn't rule her out completely until I had seen the baptism or at least a full transcript of it, but I do agree that at first glance it would appear she is the child of the couple who married the year before.

Years ago I ruled someone out for similar reasons, but had I seen the bap I would have discovered she was 15 at baptism! (It took me about ten years to rule her back in!)

[Merry]

Elizabeth bapt. 13.9.1801
Parents John and Elizabeth Pinkard
She could be a sibling or could have used the name Hannah instead of Elizabeth


It looks likely that Elizabeth was married in 1820 in Stoke Goldington.

[kiterunner]

Susannah could possibly be a mistranscription of Hannah?

[vita]

Susannah could possibly be a mistranscription of Hannah?

Could be, Kite - though death in 1874 gives her age as 72 & Susannah was

bap 1798. Just don't think its her somehow.

Agree what you say re late baptisms Merry - I've got a few of those too.

[Merry]

I think that Susanna may have married Jesse Clare in 1824. On the 1851 census Susan Clare b 1799 in Goldington is with OH, Jesse, in Turvey, Bucks.

[vita]

I think that Susanna may have married Jesse Clare in 1824. On the 1851 census Susan Clare b 1799 in Goldington is with OH, Jesse, in Turvey, Bucks.

Looks like it, Merry - thanks.