PDA

View Full Version : Nathaniel Leggate 5 X G Grandfather


borobabs
27-02-13, 15:43
Name - "official" name and what they were known as
Nathaniel Leggate

Date and place of birth
Abt 1750

Names of parents
William and ???

Date and place of baptism - if applicable
Parish Record Collection - Baptism CloseSurname:Legget
Forenames:Nathan
Baptism Year:1750
Baptism Month:SEP
Baptism Day:6
Mother:X
Father:
Place:Swanscombe
County:Kent
Source:St.Peter St.Paul Swanscombe 1750-1862 baptismsNotes:SON OF WILLIAM
Record source:Thames & Medway BaptismsData provider:Rob Cottrell, Trueflare Limited


Details of each of his or her marriages - if any

Married Anne Brooke 1765
Parish Record Collection - Marriage Record

Year: 1765
Supplied Surname: BROOK
Surname: BROOK
Full First name: Anne
Supplied First Name: An
Spouse Surname: LEGGATE
Spouse Full First name: N
Spouse First Name: N
Place: IPSWICH ST PETER
County: Suffolk
Record source: Boyd's Marriage Index 1538-1840
Data provider: Society of Genealogists


Occupation(s) - if any
???

Addresses where they lived (including county if in UK) - and please list which censuses you have or haven't found him/her on (if s/he lived in census times!)
???

Date, place and cause of death
???

Date and place of burial.
???

Details of will / administration of their estate - if applicable
Memorial inscription - if any
???

kiterunner
27-02-13, 15:55
Who is their child that's your 4xg, please, Babs? It looks a bit unlikely that the Nathan baptised 1750 in Kent would get married in Suffolk in 1765, don't you think?

borobabs
27-02-13, 16:12
Pass Kate thought farm workers moved all over , I didnt do the 4X one as I didnt know her second name then have since found out by a link up tree , go on tell me Im wrong

kiterunner
27-02-13, 16:27
What info do you have about your 4xg, then, Babs?

It's not just the move from Kent to Suffolk that seems unlikely but also that he would either be very young when he got married, or baptised late which wasn't so common in those days.

borobabs
27-02-13, 16:51
It was William Rice b abt 1750 who was married to a Lucy they where parents of Henry 1783 and James 1790

kiterunner
27-02-13, 17:07
So is Lucy the daughter of Nathaniel and Ann, Babs?

kiterunner
27-02-13, 17:12
If so then this is the link to her thread but it looks as though we need to go forward a generation or two first to make sure we have the right people:
http://www.genealogistsforum.co.uk/Forum/showthread.php?t=15684&highlight=rice

borobabs
27-02-13, 18:13
Yes she is I missed posting about her with second name being missing

borobabs
27-02-13, 18:15
Elizabeths parents are James and Amelia millicent waller

kiterunner
27-02-13, 19:13
I don't really know which thread to post this on, but I have been having a look at the public trees on ancestry which have James Rice and Millicent / Amelia Waller on them and I can't see any which actually have a baptism for James on, so I'm not sure where the names William and Lucy have come from for his parents at the moment - we need to confirm that his parents are William and Lucy before we try to trace Lucy back and find out who her parents were.

borobabs
27-02-13, 19:18
Kate here is tree on aancestry we have been rellies from way back

http://trees.ancestry.co.uk/tree/8457019/person/-947328709

kiterunner
27-02-13, 19:21
Yes, I've seen that one already, Babs, but it doesn't show a parish where James was born / baptised and we don't know where they got the names William and Lucy for his parents from.