PDA

View Full Version : William HARE


Lindsay
23-12-11, 12:31
Link to daughter Mary Ann Hare on TOGG3: http://www.genealogistsforum.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=10136&highlight=mary+hare

Name - "official" name and what they were known as
William Hare
Date and place of birth
Names of parents
Date and place of baptism - if applicable
Details of each of his or her marriages - if any
Married to Elizabeth (nee ??). All their children were born in Enfield Middlesex but no marriage found.
Occupation(s) - if any
There's a possiblility he was a fishmonger but no proof
Addresses where they lived (including county if in UK) - and please list which censuses you have or haven't found him/her on (if s/he lived in census times!).
1789-1807 had 9 children baptised at St Andrew Enfield
Date, place and cause of death
Possible burial for William Hare 9 Mar 1851 age 85. On 1841 census there's a William Hare, right age for this man, fishmonger, but his wife(?) isn't Elizabeth, and I haven't found a death for Elizabeth or a remarriage for him. What makes it more likely he is the right one is a burial for William Hare junior in 1811, fishman, the right age to be his son.
Date and place of burial.
Details of will / administration of their estate - if applicable
Memorial inscription - if any

kiterunner
27-12-11, 17:30
I can't find the 1841 census entry, Lindsay; could you post up the details, please?

Lindsay
27-12-11, 20:37
Afraid I can't find the notes I made - as I wasn't sure it was the right person I put them to one side... Fatal.

From memory it was William Hare, fishmonger, living in Enfield with Mary Hare. The age roughly matched the William Hare buried 1851 so dob about 1766 (there is a matching baptism for this William in Enfield).

(No Ancestry at the moment so I can't check myself).

Edit - just found some notes saying I had a possible burial for Elizabeth - St Andrew Enfield, 30 April 1843, age 84 ie born c. 1759. So she should be in 1841 census, but I never managed to find her.

kiterunner
27-12-11, 22:50
Right, thanks. Ancestry have them down as Hau. Mary doesn't have to be his wife; she could be a sister, sister-in-law, or some other relative.

Lindsay
28-12-11, 07:22
That's true, it's proving it that's the problem!

Thanks for looking - I'll make a note of the mistranscription so I can find him when I get Ancestry access back.

kiterunner
28-12-11, 09:35
I've submitted a correction anyway.