PDA

View Full Version : Roake in 1871???? All help appreciated


Sue at the seaside
09-09-11, 22:23
Wondering if anyone can find a family in 1871 for me, I had no luck over the last few days!

Surname - Roake
Mother is Hannah b 1840
Children
Alice Mary b 1862
George b 1864
Charles James b 1866

All born in Newbury Berkshire.

As I can't find a marriage, this is the only way I can think of getting the father's name!

kiterunner
09-09-11, 22:35
They're transcribed as Reakes on ancestry, but the father isn't with them. I think the surname actually says Roakes on the image but it's quite hard to make out. Hannah is listed as a widow.

Sue at the seaside
09-09-11, 22:38
They're transcribed as Reakes on ancestry, but the father isn't with them. I think the surname actually says Roakes on the image but it's quite hard to make out. Hannah is listed as a widow.

Thanks so much for that, I'm off to have a look now, was meant to be off to bed!!! any idea how I'm going to find out who her husband was??

kiterunner
09-09-11, 22:40
I'm working on it, no luck yet.

kiterunner
09-09-11, 22:45
There is an Augustus A Roake death in Newbury in 1866, age 37., but I can't see a marriage for him. I don't suppose you want to buy a birth cert for one of the children?

kiterunner
09-09-11, 22:49
Aha! He is on FreeBMD as Augustus Angell Koakne, married Jul-Sep 1861 Newbury and one of the possible brides is a Hannah Adey. Looking at the image, he is indexed in the K's instead of the R's, although I think it says Koake rather than Koakne.

kiterunner
09-09-11, 22:50
Augustus Angell Roake entry in the National Probate Calendar - died 10 May 1866, administration to Hannah Roake widow. I'm off to bed now!

Sue at the seaside
09-09-11, 22:51
There is an Augustus A Roake death in Newbury in 1866, age 37., but I can't see a marriage for him. I don't suppose you want to buy a birth cert for one of the children?

I think I'm going to have to, but as this is a bit of a hunt for a friend I'm reluctant to spend the money. but there is another cert I need before this one! I'll post more of the problem tomorrow, see if you can come up with any more ideas. But in the meantime, Augustus looks hopeful. Thanks.

Sue at the seaside
09-09-11, 22:54
Augustus is looking more likely, in 1861 he is a Draper, guess what his son George was........ A draper!

Sue at the seaside
09-09-11, 22:58
Whoopee, found his probate, he left his money to his widow Hannah (£3000)

Sue at the seaside
09-09-11, 23:05
Sorry Kate, I was so engrossed in this I hadn't noticed all your posts, it seems we were looking at the same stuff, but thanks for the marriage, brilliant!